NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A federal appeals court has handed BP another victory in its bid to block what could be hundreds of millions of dollars in settlement payments to Gulf Coast businesses following the company’s 2010 oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

juneau-001jpg-528d3f5c5213f15c
Claims administrator Patrick Juneau

A three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday that a judge must reconsider BP PLC’s arguments that the settlement shouldn’t compensate businesses if their losses can’t be directly traced to the nation’s worst offshore oil spill. The panel said U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier erred last month in refusing to consider the company’s “causation” arguments.

The spill occurred after BP’s Macondo well blew out in April 2010, causing the Deepwater Horizon drilling rig to explode, killing 11 workers. Millions of gallons of oil spewed into the Gulf, with crude soiling shoreline and beaches from Louisiana to Florida. So far, the oil giant has paid out billions of dollars to residents and businesses affected by the spill.

For months, and on several different fronts, BP has been attacking Barbier’s interpretation of its multibillion-dollar settlement with a team of private plaintiffs’ attorneys. In October, the same 5th Circuit panel overturned Barbier’s earlier rulings on the dispute over payouts to businesses.

BP had argued Barbier and court-appointed claims administrator Patrick Juneau misinterpreted the deal’s terms in ways that could have forced the company to pay for billions of dollars in bogus or inflated claims by businesses. Plaintiffs’ lawyers countered that BP simply undervalued the settlement and underestimated how many claimants would qualify for payments.

But the panel told Barbier to craft a “narrowly-tailored” order that bars Juneau from paying certain claims. BP argued Barbier didn’t go far enough when he issued an order to comply with the 5th Circuit’s directives.

In response to BP’s arguments, Barbier said BP and the plaintiffs’ lawyers had agreed on an “objective and specific method of proving whether or not a loss was caused by the oil spill.” And losses for businesses located in certain areas were presumed to be caused by the spill under the settlement’s terms, the judge added last month.

 DSC0380
Photo by John Mosier

Barbier wrote that it would not only be unreasonable to expect thousands of claimants to prove losses were directly traced to the spill, but that doing so would defeat the purpose of a class settlement.

In a court filing, plaintiffs’ attorneys accused BP of taking settlement terms “out of context and in isolation” in arguing that businesses must meet certain “subjective and as-yet-undefined” requirements to qualify for settlement payments.

On Monday, the divided 5th Circuit panel directed Barbier to craft an order that will allow businesses who can trace their losses to the spill to continue receiving payments, but that will ensure those who cannot trace their losses to the spill don’t receive compensation until the case is resolved.

5th Circuit Judge James Dennis, who wrote a dissenting opinion in October, once again disagreed with his two other colleagues on the panel and expressed support for Barbier’s reasoning. Dennis said he believes BP’s causation arguments “clearly did not survive the parties’ settlement agreement.”

In a court filing last month, BP attorneys complained that Juneau has awarded at least $76 million to dozens of claimants whose losses were caused by something other than the spill. They said an Alabama excavation company, for instance, received roughly $3.5 million even though its decrease in revenue resulted from the company’s decision to sell most of its assets months before the spill.

“These egregious awards do not represent economic losses caused by the spill, and they contradict the plain terms and purpose of the settlement,” BP lawyers wrote. “Yet [Juneau] nonetheless issued them, and under [Barbier’s] rulings is entitled to continue doing so.”

Barbier said he found it “deeply disappointing” that BP accused Juneau of rewriting and disregarding the settlement terms.

“To the contrary, when it talks about causation, if anyone is attempting to rewrite or disregard the unambiguous terms of the Settlement Agreement, it is counsel for BP,” he wrote in last month’s order.

To post a comment, please log into your IND account. If you do not have an account, click the "register" button to create one. Facebook comments can be used as an alternative to creating an account at theIND.com.

feed-image RSS Feed
Loading
Chart
ABiz Stock Watch
o Home Bancorp 22.31 ▲0.11 (0.50%)
o Frank's International 19.48 ▼0.33 (-1.67%)
o IberiaBank Corp 67.24 ▼0.76 (-1.12%)
o LHC Group 23.97 ▼0.03 (-0.13%)
o MidSouth Bancorp 19.14 ▼0.01 (-0.05%)
o Petroquest Energy 5.96 ▲0.07 (1.19%)
o PHI Inc. 42.80 ▲0.33 (0.78%)
o Superior Energy 34.21 ▲1.03 (3.10%)
o Stone Energy 32.38 ▲0.36 (1.12%)
o Facebook Inc. 76.08 ▲1.50 (2.01%)
o Twitter Inc. 50.83 ▲1.45 (2.94%)
o Gannett 32.45 ▲0.35 (1.09%)
NYSE:HBCP

Home Bancorp

Company ID [NYSE:HBCP] Last trade:22.31 Trade time:4:00PM EDT Value change:▲0.11 (0.50%)
NYSE:FI

Frank's International

Company ID [NYSE:FI] Last trade:19.48 Trade time:4:02PM EDT Value change:▼0.33 (-1.67%)
NYSE:IBKC

IberiaBank Corp

Company ID [NYSE:IBKC] Last trade:67.24 Trade time:4:00PM EDT Value change:▼0.76 (-1.12%)
NYSE:LHCG

LHC Group

Company ID [NYSE:LHCG] Last trade:23.97 Trade time:4:00PM EDT Value change:▼0.03 (-0.13%)
NYSE:MSL

MidSouth Bancorp

Company ID [NYSE:MSL] Last trade:19.14 Trade time:4:01PM EDT Value change:▼0.01 (-0.05%)
NYSE:PQ

Petroquest Energy

Company ID [NYSE:PQ] Last trade:5.96 Trade time:4:01PM EDT Value change:▲0.07 (1.19%)
NYSE:PHII

PHI Inc.

Company ID [NYSE:PHII] Last trade:42.80 Trade time:2:35PM EDT Value change:▲0.33 (0.78%)
NYSE:SPN

Superior Energy

Company ID [NYSE:SPN] Last trade:34.21 Trade time:4:03PM EDT Value change:▲1.03 (3.10%)
NYSE:SGY

Stone Energy

Company ID [NYSE:SGY] Last trade:32.38 Trade time:4:01PM EDT Value change:▲0.36 (1.12%)
NYSE:FB

Facebook Inc.

Company ID [NYSE:FB] Last trade:76.08 Trade time:4:00PM EDT Value change:▲1.50 (2.01%)
NYSE:TWTR

Twitter Inc.

Company ID [NYSE:TWTR] Last trade:50.83 Trade time:4:00PM EDT Value change:▲1.45 (2.94%)
NYSE:GCI

Gannett

Company ID [NYSE:GCI] Last trade:32.45 Trade time:4:02PM EDT Value change:▲0.35 (1.09%)
Advertisement

Read the Flipping Paper!

Click Here for the Entire Print Version of
ABiz
 
Advertisement
Advertisement