News -> INDReporter MON, OCT 15 11:57AM by Patrick Flanagan

The expiration of four tax breaks for families looms

The fate of four federal tax breaks for low-income families — all set to expire Jan. 1 unless renewed by Congress — will ultimately be decided with November's presidential election.

If allowed to expire, that will mean tax bill increases for many poor families nationwide and in Louisiana, according to nonprofit Louisiana Budget Project.

The credits set to expire are the products of George W. Bush's Tax Relief Reconciliation Act and President Barack Obama's 2010 Tax Relief Act. They include The Child Tax Credit, Earned Income Tax Credit, Child and Dependent Care Credit and the American Opportunity Credit.

Roberton Wiliiams, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center, tells CNNMoney that failing to renew the credits will mean tax bill increases ranging from hundreds to thousands of dollars, even for poor families.

"If you have what it takes to qualify for these particular benefits, you will get hit," says Williams.

According to CNNMoney, allowing all four of the credits to expire will mean:

Some families will take a hit on several fronts if they qualify for more than one tax break. A low-income couple with three kids, for example, will lose as much as $1,500 from expiring provisions of the Child Tax Credit. If their income is low enough, they could also see a smaller refund from the Earned Income Tax Credit, and benefits from the Child and Dependent Care Credit could be reduced as well.

As noted by CNNMoney, the fate of renewing these credits will hinge on re-electing Obama:

The upcoming presidential election has left the fate of these tax breaks uncertain. Democrats and Republicans in Congress continue to butt heads about which tax cuts should be extended, and there's virtually no chance they will agree on a specific plan before the November election, Williams said.

Even if an agreement is reached by the end of the year — which is far from a sure thing, either — next year's tax policy will ultimately depend on who takes over the Oval Office.

Click here for CNNMoney's breakdown on how low-income American families will be impacted by the expiration of each of the four credits.


Comments (2)add
...
written by Dudley E. LaBauve, III , October 15, 2012 - 04:11 pm
That is one reason I believe why Obama/Biden are constantly harping on raising taxes for people earning over $200,000/yr. (or is it $250,000, or is it $1,000,000), even though it won't put a meaningful dent in the annual budget deficit. I looked at the federal budget a couple years ago and saw the coming increase in tax revenue for 2012 and even more for 2013, and found that it was due to the reasons mentioned in your article. If allowed to expire, basically what happens is low income folks will no longer be subsidized, and will actually begin paying some income tax rather than getting more back than was paid in. In fact, if my memory serves me correctly, they are already in for a surprise at the end of 2012. I believe 2012 amounts to no subsidy, but also no income tax. Next year is no subsidy plus pay income tax somewhere in the vicinity of 8% or 9% for families at the poverty level, just like it was when Clinton was in office!

It doesn't matter for the low income earners who wins the election in this case. The Democrats will let the tax cuts expire, but also raise tax rates for the higher income earners, like when Clinton was in office!

The Republicans would like to lower income tax rates, remove tax deductions, and spread the base.

Walter, with the various deductions available to me as a small business owner, my effective tax rate is around 16%. If the Republicans get elected and do what Romney says he wants to do, I will be paying around 25%. If the Democrats get elected, I will be paying around 16-17%.

If the Democrats want to raise tax revenue and get a job, then they should vote Republican!
...
written by Dudley E. LaBauve, III , October 16, 2012 - 10:46 am
Oh, by the way, since the loving/caring Democrats are going to let the low income folks pay some income taxes going forward (unlike that horrible President Bush who subsidized the low income people), they must also insist that folks meeting the following income thresholds (the millionaires and billionaires) pay a little extra too:

3.8% tax on Net Investment Income and 0.9% increase on the EMPLOYEE portion of Medicare for:

Married Filing Jointly - combined MAGI (Modified Adjusted Gross Income) over $250,000
Married Filing Separately - MAGI over $125,,000 per person
Individuals - MAGI over $200,000
Trusts and Estates - $11,650

At least this may convince some folks to stay married. Maybe it will lower the divorce rate in this country. That's good, isn't it? I was just starting to find some good in this, until I remembered that Obamacare removes $716 billion from Medicare, but I guess the additional EMPLOYEE portion mentioned above will cover some of that along with the extra tax revenue from the low income folks.

You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it