News -> INDReporter THU, APR 14 10:41AM by Heather Miller

BP ‘Spillionaires’ story stirs ire

Nonprofit ProPublica teamed up with The Washington Post to release a scathing report Wednesday on coastal communities that took part in extreme post oil spill price gouging and local governments that were less than prudent when spending BP money — and it sure didn’t sit well with some blogs that have since responded.

The article, posted online at The Washington Post’s website, begins with the headline “‘Spillionaires’ are the new rich after BP oil spill payouts,” and largely focuses on St. Bernard Parish administrators and how they handled the cleanup contracts and money flow following the spill:
Documents show that companies with ties to parish insiders got lucrative contracts and then charged BP for every possible expense. The prime cleanup company submitted bills with little or no documentation. A subcontractor billed BP $15,400 per month to rent a generator that usually cost $1,500 a month. Another company charged BP more than a $1 million a month for land it had been renting for less than $1,700 a month. Assignments for individual fishermen also fell under the control of political leaders.

In some ways, parish residents seemed to view the disaster and BP’s culpability as an opportunity to recover from earlier blows. St. Bernard bore the brunt of Hurricane Katrina, which flooded almost every home in August 2005. Population dropped almost in half, from about 67,000 in 2000 to 36,000 in 2010, largely because people didn’t go back after Katrina and the hurricanes that followed. Before the spill, the parish slashed its budget by 11 percent, cutting garbage collection, the fire department and mosquito control. There was just no money.

The spill changed that. Fishermen were paid to lay out protective booms to try to corral the oil. Contractors were hired to manage the cleanup and provide security. Claims money began flowing to people who said their lives had been upended by the crisis.
By Wednesday night, Kevin Allman, managing editor of New Orleans’ Gambit newspaper, had responded to the ProPublica investigative report with his own headline posted on Gambit’s website: “Who needs Rush Limbaugh when you’ve got ProPublica?”

Allman countered that in all the months ProPublica reporters may have spent in South Louisiana digging for corruption documents, they perhaps failed to interview the thousands of residents who truly have suffered from the spill, those “whose claims haven’t been processed and are now bankrupt-aires and broke-aires.”

Victimizing BP and making Gulf Coast residents the antagonists of the saga could understandably incite feelings of outrage among Louisianans, but lest we forget we’ve heard of those poor New Orleans waiters and waitresses cashing in on upwards of $10,000 from BP during a time when the Crescent City experienced record tourism numbers. (One New Orleans waiter I know received two $5,000 BP checks following the spill; he works at a chain restaurant that doesn’t even use Louisiana seafood.)

But Allman also points out that ProPublica, a nonprofit journalism organization, has itself been at the center of controversy regarding compensation:
If we’re going to talk ridiculous compensation, we can go back to 2009, when the journalism world was buzzing about the top salaries at the nonprofit ProPublica, where the top editor made $570K a year and senior reporters were pulling down more than $200K in salary and compensation. Their prerogative, of course, but I’d wager that’s a bit more than the average fisherman or boat owner in Plaquemines has ever pulled down — before or after the oil disaster.

I wonder if Barker’s reporting took her to Grand Isle to see the For Sale signs on every other house, or if she talked to any of the Raceland “spillionaires” Alex Woodward met last weekend, ailing “spillionaires” who can’t work or get medical treatment despite some pretty scary chemical exposure symptoms. Would you call them “spillionaires” to their faces?

Comments (5)add
...
written by CIANO LEAL , April 14, 2011 - 05:39 pm
Its said that every story has two sides, "this is correct, although there can only exist one true side, that is one factual side.......BP has now experienced the unlimited unlawfull louisiana political machine which makes DAILEY'S CHICAGOANS SEEM LIKE PANHANDLERS, we have the best paid politicians anyones money can buy.......and the MOST ya-yaing WHINERS, a la KEVIN ALLMAN, TO NAME ONE.
...
written by CIANO LEAL , April 14, 2011 - 05:41 pm
Thank God for PROPUBLICA, BECAUSE YOU JERKS SURELY WOULD NOT FESS UP TO ANY WRONGDOINGS.
...
written by The Oberserver , April 14, 2011 - 08:41 pm
What can we expect. Greed and corruption is now in the DNA of the politicians, and the politically connected! Why does it piss people off when someone reports the truth about Louisiana? Remember: "THE REVOLUTION WILL NOT BE TELEVISED!!!!!!!"
...
written by Gaius Cilnius Maecenas , April 17, 2011 - 12:24 am
Heather is to be congratulated on reporting this case! It feeds too easily into stereotypes about Louisiana. I myself am guilty of this all too often. I suspect (naturally with no objective data to support it) that BP is the source of this article. You expect scoundrels in business and politics [and this is not a Louisiana monopoly] to benefit from a crisis & catastrophe, if they can. We need more third-party objective data to arrive at a proper judgment here. I applaud Heather for starting the process: note she did not assert a value judgment in her reporting---just the facts ma'am, she gave us!
...
written by NORTHSIDIAN SHOTGUN , April 18, 2011 - 12:58 pm
There you go Maecenas, now you're clicking on all 8, with this personal deduction of a situation, you have clearly come across well, your posted comment is not like you are reading a mensa bulletin.
And " NO ! I don't want to be your Penpal.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it