News -> INDReporter MON, OCT 10 11:23AM by Heather Miller

LPSS readies for districtwide open house

Lafayette Parish voters have a chance to see for themselves Monday night what’s at the heart of a Lafayette Parish School Board property tax proposal going before voters Oct. 22.

With less than two weeks until voters cast their vote for or against a 25-mill property tax that would fund more than half a billion dollars of critical school repairs, new construction and maintenance, the school system is opening every school in the district from 6 to 8 p.m. Monday to offer tours and information about the facilities master plan.

The master plan, finalized by the School Board in 2010, calls for the replacement of seven schools: Northside and Lafayette high schools, L.J. Alleman Middle School, Carencro Heights, Green T. Lindon, Katharine Drexel and J.W. Faulk elementary schools. It also outlines new additions to several other schools, as well as maintenance upgrades districtwide.

And as election day inches closer, advocates on both sides of the tax prop can be heard loud and clear through websites, radio spots and other mediums.

Invest in our Children’s Future, a political action committee formed by a grassroots education group, has a website laying out its case for the new tax, which includes a 10-minute League of Women Voters video showing the condition of schools.

The Tea Party of Lafayette acknowledges on its website that the proposal would equate to a roughly 29 percent tax increase. But in a radio spot that aired on KPEL 96.5 Monday morning, TPL Lafayette coordinator Joyce Linde told listeners that a yes vote would “almost double” what residents currently pay in property taxes every year. Other TPL literature has stated that the tax increase would be almost 75 percent.

But TPL was accurate Monday morning when it reminded voters that the school board has already approved a $17-$18 million contact with CSRS Inc. of Baton Rouge for the master plan’s implementation. As noted Aug. 23 in The Independent ("Marketing the Mark-up"), the board approved the contract two months before it’s even known whether the money will be secured. CSRS is the same firm that created the master plan, for which the school board paid more than $900,000.

As also reported Sept. 21 in The Independent’s “Dearth and Taxes,” Lafayette Parish voters pay less school taxes than other parishes comparable in size, and would still be doing so even if the tax passes.

For more on the master plan, visit the school board’s master plan website.


Comments (45)add
...
written by the original northsidian , October 10, 2011 - 12:15 pm
VOTE NO TO HIGHER PROPERTY TAXES. NO TO SWEETHEART CONTRACTS TO BUILD SCHOOLS THAT LEAK. NO TO CONTRACTS TO BUILD SCHOOLS WITH MOLD PROBLEMS. JUST VOTE NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!
...
written by Ophelia 46 , October 10, 2011 - 12:44 pm
Actually --- TPL was right on both counts. It IS a 75 per cent increase in school board property taxes - from just over 33 mills to over 58 mills. The increase in parishwide property taxes --including school board, city, parish, sheriff, Bayou Vermillion, LEDA, etc -- is about 29 per cent.
And while our millage rate is lower than some other parishes, we still have higher taxable property value than many others. Lafayette Parish spending per student (@$10,100) is right at the state spending per student( @$10,500). With a $395 million dollar budget, $20 million in stimulus money (and asking for more); $20-25 million diverted to the technical high school; current bondable sales tax money, and a millage renewal for maintenance that was just passed, why do they need this massive increase in our property taxes???
...
written by Hope , October 10, 2011 - 02:02 pm
Oh, I've been anxiously awaiting this PR joke. I already have toured some of the schools. Lets see, E A Martin is in pretty good shape as is Broadmoor Elem. Seems as if they've been maintained! Milton Elem is in good shape and well maintained as is Youngsville Middle & the little elem school. Someone is taking care of those schools! Some are new, & some are not so new, but they've been taken care of. Comeaux High is full of butler building, but has been since the late 70s & LPSB HAD TONS OF MONEY TO BUILD A WING OR WINGS BY NOW. Laf High is filthy - on purpose. September, the grass needed cutting & a housewashing machine & a little paint would have done wonders, but the wonderkids wanting this tax rape of property & business owners have deliberately let those schools look like crap. Last week, I took my daughter for testing @ Acadiana, opened in or close to 1970 and it still looks like it can go another 30 yrs at least. SO THERE IS NOT EMERGENCY, NO REAL NEED TO WASTE MORE MONEY, RUN BUSINESSES OUT OF TOWN, PROHIBIT HOME OWNERSHIP because of the huge property liabilities. When I read the proposition on the ballot, I don't believe its restrictive enough; doesn't spell out exactly how the money can be spent. It does mention "buildings" that would pertain to maintenance, & to me that means storage buildings. I absolutely believe before its over, the plan is to move payroll for maintenance personnel to that account. When the schl brd moved $4 million of maintenance money to use for class sizes, I QUIT TRUSTING EDUCATION TO SPEND MY MONEY WISELY. I know businesses whose tax burden is going to cripple them, small businesses, Mom & Pop businesses & this tax increase will cripple them. I guess that doesn't matter to some citizens.
IBERIA PARISH IS GOING TO RUN THEIR SCHOOLS THIS YEAR & THEY'RE NOT TAKING MORE PROPERTY TAX MONEY FROM THEIR PEOPLE!
...
written by Pedro , October 10, 2011 - 04:22 pm
For the sake of accuracy.... above link to tea party website is invalid, ....www.teapartyoflafayette.com.

I thought part of the CSRS money approved was for pre election PR for tax proposition....does that include the open houses? How much money are we spending to staff the schools for the two hour open houses?

...
written by Layne St.Julien , October 10, 2011 - 05:00 pm
They're being staffed by volunteers. And for those who wish to talk with credibility about the problems, visit a few of the seven schools that are needing to be replaced before you speak. Also get a copy of the list of needed maintenance for each school. There are drainage issues, mold issues, crowding issues, safety issues and much more that aren't visible on a fly-by.
...
written by the original northsidian , October 10, 2011 - 06:28 pm
Layne: Any relatives that work in the school system (teachers,bus drivers,etc) including yourself? Any connection to any construction company? Any connection to any school board member? Any connection to anyone that makes money off the school board. (not school board money, but taxpayer money they don't spend properly) Also do you have any idea why the schools have not be maintained all these years?
...
written by Pedro , October 10, 2011 - 06:47 pm
I am in the schools frequently. It is funny the LPSS is unable to hire a janitorial staff or administration to supervise a janitorial staff, to at least make sure broken toilet seats are replaced, toilet paper stocked, soap in bathrooms, bathrooms serviced, fans dusted, a/c filters changed, a/c units working, floors mopped, and the grass cut. How hard is it to spray Round Up around a fence line? Simple stuff.

We can't afford janitors but we can afford to pay consultants millions of dollars? Go figure.

Heck, we gave Lemoine enough money. On the weekends he should be out there spraying Round Up.

The LPSB has more pressing problems, hoodies, cell phones, changing the grading scale, changing the length of uniform shorts, and hiring attorneys to give us opinions any fool with common sense should already know. Still hoping for some change.....
...
written by ragin_cajun , October 10, 2011 - 07:50 pm
Layne --

Can you tell us, with some credibility, about the recommendation to LPSS that they outsource all facilities management, maintenance, food service, to Aramark? Have you heard anything about that? Do you think that'd be a good idea? If so, why?
...
written by Sam's Mom , October 10, 2011 - 08:35 pm
I'm voting YES for this much needed referendum! I think giving up the equivalent of a can of soda per day is worth 7 new schools, 6 major additions and countless upgrades to our schools.
...
written by NancyPants , October 10, 2011 - 08:39 pm
I have no problem paying CSRS to do a job. I don't think anyone here would be willing to work for free.
They will be overseeing a 561 million dollar project, they will be responsible for making sure the work is done on time and that the master plan is followed. They have a sound and proven reputation. They have experience with positive results in other districts.
Its a shame so many get hung up on the CSRS issue and refuse to see the bigger picture-the fact that our schools are outdated and unsafe and need to be replaced.
...
written by Leslie Turk , October 10, 2011 - 08:52 pm
To ALL KAPS IZ KEWL: All caps is not cool, and I'm not going to post. Try again.
...
written by Hope , October 11, 2011 - 04:53 am
I'm not willing to P away $18 Million PLUS tax dollars when that job should be in the schl board & that money could be put to better use. Someone is going to collect that cash though. PEDRO is a parent & I think he's on the right track. ITS LPSB neglect. Its negligence, deliberate, to trick the unknowing public into thinking A BILLION PLUS dollars will fix everything. This huge tax will hurt homeowners & businesses and renters! Pedro is correct when he says day2day maintenance isn't taking place, like broken toilets. There's no excuse for that. Pedro, a parent, is who pointed out how LPSB stole money from maintenance to reduce class size, 4 millon $. So I know there are plans for the "freed up" money. Its not gonna read in the proposition "We have plans for your money" but its gonna take place. It will take years to undo the neglect of years, BUT THE MONEY IS ALREADY THERE & IT ALWAYS HAS BEEN. VOTE NO, VOTE NO, VOTE NO.
...
written by Southsider , October 11, 2011 - 05:59 am
Does anyone that the new Career Technical School will have an athletic facility! Imagine that. You can't/won't cut it at a regular high school, so lets go to a trade school. Thats cool. While at trade school, lets form a football team! Yeah, that makes sense.

Does anyone know how Phase 2 will be paid for? It hasn't been shown anywhere in the plan. Just curious...
...
written by Morrow , October 11, 2011 - 06:52 am
Southsider, Phase 2, whatever the hell that is, will probably have to be covered by another property tax increase. A trade school is not a bad idea & I think all the "specialty" schools should go there along with "the gifted" program. So, only 1 school would be needed. The fact remains, there already IS enough money for LPSB to build & maintain schools. It just chooses not to. I find it funny the rabid proponents aren't willing to cut anywhere or make any compromises. Pedro, poor fella, is the only person I've seen on here who had kids in the school system, who will admit purposeful neglect & admit he's not sure of this plan either. Long grass, dirty schools, dirty cafeterias - there is not excuse for that. The schl board has the personnel & means to maintain schls. Comeaux High has had butler builings since the 70s, so a dozen wings could have been built. This tax is SCHEME to boondoggle property owners in providing more money to waste. It will cripple some businesses. The only people to benefit from this will be the consulting firm, the oversight firm (18 Mil $) & the construction companies & vendors. In addition, I believe there is another "master plan" on what to do with the millions of freed up dollars in the general fund!




...
written by Leslie Turk , October 11, 2011 - 06:57 am
To ALL CAPS, sorry, you're wrong. We have had many problems with Northsidian Shotgun's all caps. Just ask him.
...
written by UtahCajun , October 11, 2011 - 08:15 am
If the well-to-do folks in Lafayette would stop abusing the property tax system, LPSS would not be hitting us up for more funds.
...
written by Layne St.Julien , October 11, 2011 - 08:44 am
Those who think the facilities problems are about long grass, old paint and unwashed buildings really aren't up to speed.

There are lists of the structural, health, safety, and infrastructure problems found at each of our schools at http://lpss.csrsonline.com/Fac...fault.aspx

Take a video tour of some of the schools by watching the video produced by the League of Women Voters (second video from the top) at http://investinourchildrensfut...r-yourself
...
written by Pedro , October 11, 2011 - 09:25 am
I have several problems with this tax proposition. Lafayette has historically expected and received very little from the LPSS/LPSB.

I keep hearing, it does no good to "point fingers". I don't understand this statement. We retain and pay LPSS employees not doing their jobs. I want to "point fingers", ask questions and get answers. Fine example is Beasley at many LPSB meetings. Many times he receives vague, inaccurate answers or is stonewalled. We have given the LPSS/LPSB our permission to operate in this way by our lack of demands.

The tax proposition again absolves the LPSB of any responsibility and demonstrates how little we expect from the people responsible for our children's education.

There is so much simple maintenance not being performed. Great example is LHS. Leonard is great at presentation and speaking. He is not so great at (managing) keeping his campus clean, equipment operating or retaining great teachers. Many of our other schools have the same problem.

We need to expect more of the LPSS/LPSB before we build new buildings.






...
written by Cajunhiker , October 11, 2011 - 09:50 am
I wonder what the late David Thibodaux's postion would be on this tax proposal?
...
written by Pedro , October 11, 2011 - 10:14 am
Layne,
I think the majority of us know the problems are more extensive than simple maintenance. I don't need to see video. The point/question is, why are simple maintenance tasks not being performed? There are no excuses for broken toilet seats,dirty bathrooms, high grass, dirty floors, dusty,moldy classrooms etc. I don't want to hear excuses. I want to see results.

We know we can build new buildings and start new programs. Been there, done that.

The problem I have is hiring consultants and spending more money while still allowing the same old stuff to continue. Where is the citizen's committee for that problem?

...
written by Dudley E. LaBauve, III , October 11, 2011 - 10:22 am
Connect the dots within the Master Plan and you will find that the construction estimates, with all contingency costs included, do not match, or even come close, to the Financial Summary figure which is being used as the basis for the Property Tax millage increase. Also, as others have pointed out, the proposed tax will only service the 20 year bond debt on the first half of the proposed project. The second half of the project will need another funding source to service the debt, like, for example, another property tax increase.
If there wasn't such a large discrepancy between the estimated costs to do the project and what we are being asked to pay taxes on, I might be more supportive. It really feels like some folks will be able to use the Master Plan as a retirement fund.
When I ran for school board, I gave specific examples of what I am talking about, and asked for explanations. I got nothing. The cold hard numbers are all in the Master Plan, but are in multiple locations, so, one has to look for it, summarize it, and compare it to the Financial Summary. Once again, very large discrepancies exist between COST ESTIMATES (INCLUDING CONTINGENCY COSTS) and WHAT WE ARE BEING ASKED TO PAY TAXES ON! If there is an explanation, please, do explain!
I own a small business and own a small piece of commercial property. This tax won't cripple me, but I don't like getting ripped off!
...
written by RuthT , October 11, 2011 - 11:10 am
Cajunhiker - David Thibodaux STARTED this process. He was the lone voice for many years...trying to make the rest of the school board take notice, talking to community leaders, making presentations at community organization meetings, and holding public meetings with parents. He had notebooks full of photos documenting many of the problems in our schools and hundreds of pages of notes, including requests from teachers and administrators to fix and replace facilities.

Pedro - your contention that schools are not being maintained on purpose and that money will be diverted to individuals instead of used to fix facilities smacks of the sort of conspiracy theory that people trot out in an attempt to scare the ignorant masses and make themselves sound knowledgeable.

Do maintenance workers at the schools sometimes fail to work as hard as they should? Absolutely. It's hard as heck to get people to take those (the lowest paying) jobs and sometimes they aren't the brightest bulbs in the lamp or the most motivated. But that's an issue that should be resolved by the principals on each campus...it's hardly reflective of a system-wide conspiracy.

Major maintenance - replacing buildings, replacing wiring, plumbing, boilers, roofs, etc.... has been deferred for a multitude of reasons over the last few decades. Might our money have been better spent? Probably. But we are now faced with a problem of major proportions, with our children (mine included) spending most of the waking hours 177 days of the year in buildings that are unsafe and inadequate.

Everything possible has been done to ensure that the money collected through the additional millage will only be used for building construction and maintenance. I can assure you that the people I know who are on the citizens oversight committee (I'm NOT one of them) will be all over the school board if even a penny of that money is diverted from its stated purpose.

We can, of course, continue to put this off and then pay double again in another 10 years, after a few children get hurt and their parents sue the school system. And won't that be fun?
...
written by Southsider , October 11, 2011 - 11:11 am
If you look at the Master Plan on the LPSB website, you will see the proposed construction, design, bidding, etc. Lafayette for Phase 1 will be one building, i suppose multi-storied. For the whole project, Phase 2 must be implemented which will include more buildings and parking. Great! So if Phase 1 tax is approved, but not Phase 2, how will it get built and how is going to get paid for?
...
written by Layne St.Julien , October 11, 2011 - 11:36 am
Southsider, I'm not sure what you're looking at. I just looked at the site myself and see that Phase I involves rebuilding seven of our schools, adding classrooms (to get rid of some of the Butler Buildings) at six schools, and doing the most pressing maintenance at virtually every other school. http://lpss.csrsonline.com/Pha...fault.aspx
...
written by Pedro , October 11, 2011 - 12:57 pm
Whoa! I am not accusing anyone of any "conspiracy". Don't put words in my "pen". I am simply asking questions. I did not "contend system-wide conspiracy". I know the LPSS does not expect much of the janitors. It shows.

You are categorizing the "type" of people LPSS employs as janitors. I find your attitude typical of the LPSS. Again, we get what we expect (very little). I am simply asking why they don't do the jobs we pay them to do. Our facilities are not maintained and I see no evidence the LPSS/LPSB is attempting to change. It is not hard to mow grass, mop floors, dust fans, clean bathrooms, install bathroom doors, replace broken toilet seats, replace A/C units.

We are going to spend millions hiring consultants to do the job(s) we pay/paid LPSS employees?

It is great "the people you know, will be all over the school board if even a penny is diverted..." The fact is, it does not matter. They have no vote or power to change decisions by the LPSB.

We need a new superintendent. We have needed one since we fired Easton. We need accountability. Show me.

...
written by Hope , October 11, 2011 - 01:33 pm
Pedro, I'm so sorry you have been fighting for decent maintenance in the schools your children attend. I have been told by Ruth & by Elaine B that I am stupid for implying I believe funds to staff "Maintenance" will be used from new tax collections. Pedro, what do you think? Just a little up, Ruth says the dept is understaffed. Well, where will funds for addtional personnel come from? I read the ballot, & I believe it is vague enough to allow payroll for maintenance to be approved later. I believe, as you do, daily maintenance is not taking place now & I'm just not willing to put more money down those broken toilets.
...
written by ragin_cajun , October 11, 2011 - 02:56 pm
It's a two phase plan. we are voting on October 22 to fund the first phase of the plan for $590 Million.

The entire plan is $1.1 Billion, so it will cost $520 Million to implement Phase 2. No one has, as yet, answered this question that has been asked over and OVER by MANY different people.

If you don't like THIS tax hike, you won't like the NEXT one any better.

See you at the polls...:)
...
written by the original northsidian , October 11, 2011 - 04:30 pm
Ruth T. I hate to say this but, do you know what the toxicology report was as the cause of the accident he was in?(you know the report no one speaks about) Quit making him out to be a unordained saint! He was a nice guy.
...
written by Southsider , October 11, 2011 - 07:55 pm
Layne...check it out..

http://lpss.csrsonline.com/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=Yy6rKzyEXeg=&tabid=92

...
written by Janie47 , October 11, 2011 - 07:56 pm
Does anyone know luke57231? His channel is loading all the videos onto the pro-tax website.
...
written by Morrow , October 12, 2011 - 04:51 am
Pedro makes the most valid point as to why this tax should be flushed down the broken toilet: the money has been in the budget for decades to maintain schools, but has continually been "diverted" to other areas. No wonder the public is sceptical it won't happen again with this trillion dollar property tax rape of the businesses & homeowners of Laf parish. I know the amount is exaggerated, but before its over, it wiil be that much, since values increase every year & everyone is omitting what is collected in sales tax every year.... I resent P-ing away $18 million to a company to oversee everything. That is a job for the school board! Maintenance is easy & if the employees are lax in their job performance, fire them. Its not so hard to do. And it seems as if some people have plans to use this money for payroll after all, if this big dollar fund will entice better employees, "brighter bulbs". I suggest the LPSB demand job performance from everyone & no more "deferring" regular maintenance. LPSB already collects enough funds to build & maintain schools. As was pointed out, soon there won't be a need for that many buildings (including the new "maintenace" buildings to house all the equipment...). NO NO NO NO NEW PROPERTY TAXES!
...
written by the original northsidian , October 12, 2011 - 04:01 pm
It will fail! People are tired of tax increases so others can get richer!! Plus it will not improve education. "IT'S THE TEACHERS/PARENTS STUPID!!"
...
written by Morrow , October 12, 2011 - 08:05 pm
Org nthsd, from your mouth to God's ears....

The LPSB has not given us any reason to trust anything they propose. I am esp concerned with how this will affect businesses.... Rents are going to increase, expenses are already up, gasoline costs are astronomical. Some businesses are going to go out of business, take it elsewhere or lay workers off. I guess they can go do janitorial work @ schools or if they're lucky, they might pick up some of that construction workd.

...
written by Aunt Ollie , October 13, 2011 - 07:08 am
This tax is definately going to pass!! The support for this tax has been overwhelming! Voters are fed up with the apathy that has plagued Lafayette for generations.
...
written by Hope , October 13, 2011 - 12:47 pm
I fear the tax may pass because I fear the LPSB employees know the freed up money will go directly into their pockets or their benefits. In order to receive that money, they have to turn out to vote. I suspect Aunt Ollie knows exactly where all that extra money in the general fund is going to go. I hope the voters are fed up with LPSB trashing away our hard earned dollars.
...
written by Layne St.Julien , October 13, 2011 - 12:52 pm
Southsider, what you've linked to is Phase I plan for Lafayette High. There are also Phase I plans for each of the other six schools that would be rebuilt, as well as for the additions and maintenance for other schools.
...
written by Aunt Ollie , October 13, 2011 - 02:51 pm
Went to my neighborhood association meeting last night and was really excited to learn that my neighbors are just as concerned about the future of Lafayette as I am. I counted at least 30 YES voters last night. (and this is a small neighborhood!)

When I learned that the money generated by this tax is DEDICATED and that its use it spelled out in the Master Facility Plan which is specifically listed in the wording on the ballot-I was sold. I am even happier now with my decision to vote YES!!!!

Come on Lafayette voters-You KNOW this is what's right for our parish!!
...
written by Pedro , October 13, 2011 - 09:45 pm
We are all concerned about the future of Lafayette and the LPSS. New school facilities will not change the politics,lack of accountability, and incompetence in the LPSB and LPSS central office. Paying consultants over 18 million dollars proves we have no faith in the people we pay to run our schools and educate our children.

We built new schools, failed to maintain them, continue to fail to maintain our older facilities and instead of demanding accountability, we hire and pay consultants. Shiny new facilities won't change our administration's lack of accountability. Our teachers and students need us to provide more than new facilities. We are losing great teachers and it is not due to the facilities.

I heard over and over again about how the last tax proposition was "airtight" and strictly for teacher raises. In Lafayette at the LPSS/LPSB, "specific wording" does not always restrict funds for "specific use".




...
written by Pedro , October 13, 2011 - 10:32 pm
The present distribution of Lafayette Parish property tax dollars:

School Board39.6%
City-Parish Government
(See detail below)24.2%
Sheriff19.8%
Library7.7%
Economic Development2.3%
Airport2.0%
Assessor1.8%
Teche-Vermilion1.5%
Bayou Vermilion1.1

The proposed new LPSS/LPSB additional tax proposition:

with an estimated 23 mills to be levied in the first year of issue to pay said Bonds; and shall said District levy a two (2) mills tax on all the property subject to taxation in said District (an estimated $3,260,000 reasonably expected at this time to be collected from the levy of the tax for an entire year), for a period of twenty (20) years, beginning with the year 2012 and ending with the year 2031, for the purpose of repairing, maintaining and improving capital school facilities in the District, and providing equipment and furnishings therefore?

There are the numbers....

...
written by Dudley E. LaBauve, III , October 14, 2011 - 08:55 am
Yay for you RuthT! The money may be dedicated, but there is a huge unexplained premium in those figures! Don't you understand this project is full of over blown figures. Does any supporter of this tax give a damn about money? Does any supporter of this tax understand that when you approve way more funding than the real estimates (with contingencies) dictate, that it is a breeding ground for corruption. Stupid, sutpid, stupid sheep!
...
written by Hope , October 14, 2011 - 09:14 am
Aunt Ollie has family employed by LPSB or who will construct or maintain or provide for LPSB. I believe Pedro is correct. I have spoken with education employees & they are surprisingly silent when I ask if they expect a raise or benefits when LPSB begins to collect the big $$$. That lack of concern, and lack of defending the tax propostion, have convinced me there are "back office" plans for freed up money. I'm also surprised at the lack of concern at what this enormous tax will do to businesses & the economy. Additional property tax will benefit no one but school board employees & providers. I think it sinful to waste $18 Million to give to a co. to do the school board's job. Lafayette once was a good place to live. Now, it full of selfish uncaring people.
...
written by Aunt Ollie , October 15, 2011 - 08:21 am
Tens of thousands will be voting YES next weekend and I'm proud to be a part of that group!
Let's keep moving forward Lafayette!!!
...
written by Aunt Ollie , October 15, 2011 - 08:30 am
ADMIN- why do you continually allow the likes of Hope to call people out personally in his comments yet when they respond you won't post?
His comments are always filled with lies and ignorant inflammatory remarks.
Hope must have family in admin. Lol. At least thats what he would say!

...
written by This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it , October 15, 2011 - 11:09 am
The local engineering company I work for specializes in energy management for HVAC systems. They will pay for the project upfront with their own money and only get paid for the work if they create energy savings. A portion of the savings go to us for our work performed, and the rest goes back to the school. Thus, equating to a net positive cash flow for the schools instead of increasing taxes to pay for projects. Some community support for our cause to help these schools out could go a long way in getting through the bureaucracy. Please contact your local representatives and inform them of what we can offer the LPSS and get them on board with our shared-savings agreements.
Our website is www.syntergyems.com.
Thank you Acadiana!
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
...
written by Just a Voice , October 17, 2011 - 07:04 am
I find it a slap in the face that teachers were given less than a week notice about this open house. Luckily, many of the principals were smart enough to let teachers stay home. Many of these schools had 1, 2, or very few parents show up. Several schools had 0!

This is only part of the problem that the school system has. There are also those idiots, such as Ken Doucet, who filed a Level 5 grievance because he was not handed the principal position he wanted. See the school board meeting minutes (3. Level 5 Grievance Hearing for Kenneth P. Douet, Staff Development Specialist(Potential Executive Session)- Lemoine).
This is the same guy who year after year, never did anything to bring up NP Moss, but was given the freedom to do what he pleased.

Fingers cross that the new sup. will get rid of the "walking dead" at central office.
You must be logged in to post a comment. Log in using your Facebook account or register if you do not have an account yet.

busy 
LA LA Land
Advertisement
Most Read
Advertisement
Advertisement
in case you missed it